1
1
Australia’s online safety regulator, the eSafety Commissioner, has initiated significant civil penalty proceedings against Telegram in the Federal Court, alleging the messaging giant failed to adequately address the spread of terrorism-linked material on its platform. The move marks a critical juncture in the global effort to hold major online platforms accountable for the content they host and signals escalating scrutiny of Telegram’s content moderation practices.
The eSafety Commissioner’s investigation, which spanned approximately one year, concluded that Telegram breached its obligations under Australia’s Online Safety Act by failing to act on multiple user complaints regarding "pro-terror" content. According to an official statement released by the regulator, the platform allegedly allowed certain unlawful material to remain visible for extended periods, in some cases for up to three weeks, after becoming aware of its existence. This inaction is a central tenet of the eSafety Commissioner’s allegations.
Furthermore, the regulator claims that Telegram did not implement sufficient measures to prevent the recurrent distribution of such material. This includes allegations that the platform failed to take adequate steps to remove accounts, channels, and groups that were consistently used as conduits for pro-terrorist propaganda. The eSafety Commissioner also presented evidence suggesting Telegram’s failure to detect known extremist content, specifically mentioning footage from the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings and the 2022 Buffalo mass shooting, before this material was eventually removed.
The potential financial repercussions for Telegram are substantial. Violations of Australia’s online safety regulations carry significant penalties, with the eSafety Commissioner seeking financial sanctions that could amount to up to AUD 54.6 million (approximately USD 35.8 million) per violation. This legal action underscores the Australian government’s commitment to enforcing its online safety framework and holding digital platforms accountable for their role in preventing the dissemination of harmful content.
Telegram has not yet issued a formal statement directly addressing the Australian legal proceedings. However, the platform’s official X account posted a video captioned "freedom of expression," which some observers have interpreted as a veiled response to the allegations. Telegram did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Cointelegraph regarding this story.

This legal challenge in Australia occurs in the context of mounting international pressure on Telegram and its CEO, Pavel Durov. The proceedings in Sydney follow closely on the heels of intensified legal actions against Durov in Russia. Just one day prior to the Australian announcement, Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) charged Durov with facilitating terrorist activity and initiated procedures to place him on an international wanted list. Russian authorities allege that Telegram has served as a platform for Ukrainian intelligence services, terrorist groups, and extremist organizations to coordinate attacks, recruit operatives, and engage in cyber fraud, by failing to remove specific channels, chats, and bots.
Telegram has also remained silent on the latest developments in Russia. However, its official X account shared an image of Durov making a profane hand gesture, a move that has been widely interpreted as a defiant stance against the accusations.
The scrutiny of Telegram extends beyond Australia and Russia, with Durov also facing ongoing investigations in France. Following his arrest at Le Bourget Airport in August 2024, French prosecutors charged Durov with multiple offenses, including complicity in the distribution of illegal content. These charges encompass material related to organized crime, allegedly disseminated through the Telegram platform.
Pavel Durov has been a vocal critic of what he perceives as growing threats to online privacy. He has frequently warned that governments are eroding protections for a free and open internet, transforming it from a tool for information exchange into an instrument of control. In an October 2025 post on X, Durov articulated this concern, stating, "What was once the promise of the free exchange of information is being turned into the ultimate tool of control."
The case brought by the eSafety Commissioner against Telegram in Australia is a significant development, reflecting a global trend of increased regulatory oversight and legal accountability for digital platforms. As messaging services like Telegram, used by over a billion people worldwide, become increasingly central to global communication, governments are grappling with the complex challenges of balancing freedom of expression with the imperative to combat terrorism and other forms of harmful content. The Australian legal action sets a precedent for how such platforms will be held responsible for their content moderation policies and their effectiveness in preventing the spread of dangerous material. The outcome of these proceedings will likely have far-reaching implications for Telegram and other major online platforms operating internationally.